CCT Trial: Walter Onnoghen knows fate on Thursday

share on:

            <div id="attachment_430336" class="wp-caption alignnone"><img aria-describedby="caption-attachment-430336" data-attachment-id="430336" data-permalink="" data-orig-file="" data-orig-size="600,450" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{"aperture":"0","credit":"","camera":"","caption":"","created_timestamp":"0","copyright":"","focal_length":"0","iso":"0","shutter_speed":"0","title":"","orientation":"0"}" data-image-title="Justice-Walter-Onnoghen.-His-suspension-by-Buhari-attracted-flaks-from-Atiku-who-wrote-a-letter-to-US-EU-and-UK-and-his-supporters-e1549531426522" data-image-description="" data-medium-file="" data-large-file="" class="wp-image-430336" src="" alt="" width="700" height="525" srcset=" 600w, 448w" sizes="(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px" data-recalc-dims="1"/><p id="caption-attachment-430336" class="wp-caption-text">Justice Walter Onnoghen</p></div>

Suspended Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Walter Onnoghen will know his fate on Thursday as the  Code of Conduct Tribunal, CCT, has fixed the date for final judgment in the alleged non-declaration of assets suit.

The CCT said on Monday that Thursday is the D-day, for Onnoghen, who reportedly resigned his appointment recently, but the presidency has not commented on his resignation yet.

ALSO READ   Unstable waves in ministry - Part 3 | The Guardian Nigeria News - Nigeria and World News

The CCT fixed the date after the prosecution led by Mr. Aliyu Umar (SAN), and the defence led by Mr. Okon Efut (SAN), adopted their final addresses.

During the proceedings, the defence, in their final arguments, maintained that the prosecution failed to prove the six counts beyond reasonable doubt as required by law and urged the tribunal to dismiss the case.

ALSO READ   Lagos govt. working to meet citizens expectations — CJ

According to Efut, the statement made by Onnoghen to the Code of Conduct Bureau was not confessional as alleged by the prosecution, saying that the charges, were incompetent and unconstitutional as they were based on the provisions of the Code of Conduct Tribunal and Bureau Act which were in conflict with the relevant provisions of the Constitution.

But the prosecution said the defence team was only attempting to redefine what constituted “proof beyond a reasonable doubt”.

He urged the tribunal to hold that the prosecution indeed proved the case beyond reasonable doubt and “return a guilty verdict”.

ALSO READ   Atiku: our request to inspect server not rejected by PEPT

Adjourning till Thursday for judgment, the tribunal chairman, Danladi Umar, said the verdict would be delivered along with two pending rulings on Onnoghen’s applications, one challenging the jurisdiction of the tribunal to hear the case and another one asking the CCT chairman to disqualify himself from further presiding over the case for being allegedly bias, Punch reports.

Leave A Comment Below
share on: